Friday, August 1, 2008

Comcast Gets a Thrashing from the FCC

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Comcast Corp has been ordered to change how it manages its broadband network after U.S. communications regulators concluded some of its tactics unreasonably restrict Internet users who share movies and other material.

In a precedent-setting decision, the five-member Federal Communications Commission voted 3-2 to uphold a complaint accusing Comcast of violating the FCC's open-Internet principles by improperly hindering peer-to-peer traffic.

"Subscribers should be able to go where they want, when they want, and generally use the Internet in any legal means," FCC Chairman Kevin Martin said in a statement.

Comcast said in a statement that it was disappointed by the decision and was considering all its "legal options."

The measure adopted by the FCC does not include any fines against Comcast. But it requires the company to cease impeding peer-to-peer applications, to tell the FCC how the practice has been used, and to notify customers about other network management practices it adopts in the future.

The ruling has been closely watched because it lays out for operators of broadband networks what the FCC considers to be a "reasonable" way for them to manage their networks.

The complaint against Comcast was filed by consumer groups who said the company had blocked file-sharing services, such as BitTorrent, that distribute TV shows and movies.

Comcast's case has become a flash point for a growing debate over a concept known as "network neutrality," that pits open-Internet advocates against some Internet service providers, who say they need to take reasonable steps to manage ever-growing traffic on their networks for the good of all users.

Comcast has said its network management practices were a reasonable choice and has argued that the FCC does not have the authority to enforce its open-Internet policy.

(Reporting by Peter Kaplan, editing by Tim Dobbyn)

*source: NY Times

Thursday, July 31, 2008

HP Touchsmart computer

What tech geek doesn't love the beauty of the fictional Star Trek touch-screen computer?

Over the decades, Star Trek has inspired a wide variety of gadgets: the cell phone, thermal shielding (NASA), and more. Now it has another brainchild. 

Touch computing started when Apple introduced the first now-ancient touch-screen handheld computer. 

It evolved into more advanced Palm and Pocket PC devices. The iPhone and iPod Touch revolutionized touch technology.

And now, we have personal, effective touch screen desktop computers.

HP (although I'm not impressed with the company) has released a new way of thinking in computing tech. It's called the Touchsmart. It functions just like any other computer - with the exception that its screen is 100% touch sensitive. Yes. You read right. That means that you can now navigate files, games, documents and more as easily as you could if you held them in your hand.

This does not mean the days of the mouse and keyboard are coming to an end. No no no. Ask any FPS gamer if he would rather use a mouse/keyboard interface or a touch screen to navigate the on-screen carnage. Most would agree that the mouse/keyboard gives an element of control that a touch screen would leave to be desired.

However! For the rest of us, this represents a HUGE step forward in computing. We may not reach the level of sophistication the Enterprise computer boasts, but surely we can keep trying.

MS

Monday, June 9, 2008

iPhone 3G released

SAN FRANCISCO - June 9, 2008

"Apple® today introduced the new iPhone 3G, combining all the revolutionary features of iPhone with 3G networking that is twice as fast as the first generation iPhone, built-in GPS for expanded location based mobile services, and iPhone 2.0 software which includes support for Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync and runs the hundreds of third party applications already built with the recently released iPhone SDK. In the US, the new iPhone 3G is priced at a stunning $199 for 8GB and $299 for 16GB."

There you have it folks. If iPhone floats your boat, check out the new model in-store or online.

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Palm OS vs Windows Mobile

Palm OS vs Windows Mobile


Palm boasts an impressive, user-friendly GUI. Windows Mobile offers compatibility. Each has its advantages, but some stand out more.


Palm OS
The Pros
  • Impressive GUI (what you see on the screen)
  • Great stability (rarely crashes)
  • Extremely wide range of available programs
  • Relatively lower prices
  • Great range of sizes - small to huge
  • Uses very few resources (Low specs can still provide good performance)
  • Integration with Microsoft Office requires third-party programs
The Cons
  • Integration with Microsoft Office requires third-party programs like "Documents to Go"
  • No built-in speaker
  • Can't multi-task (Only one program can be run at a time)
Windows Mobile
The Pros
  • Familiarity of the Windows interface
  • Drag-and-Drop integration with Windows
  • Wide multimedia capabilities (Windows Mobile Media Player v9 included)
  • Can multi task
  • Better Internet browser (Internet Explorer is included. Others can be downloaded)
  • Built-in speaker
  • Decent 3D processor for games
The Cons
  • Tend to crash
  • Fewer compatible programs (Very few games)
  • It's Windows


The decision is up to you. Basically, if you simply want a good, stable organizer, go with the Palm. If you need strong video and music capabilities, Windows Mobile may be a better choice for you.

Cheers,
MS

Wednesday, April 9, 2008

Protect yourself!

I just discovered an EXCELLENT Anti-Spyware program that I feel you might be interested in. It's called AVG Anti-Spyware. There is a commercial version, but the free version is just fine:

http://free.grisoft.com/doc/avg-anti-spyware-free/lng/us/tpl/v5

Monday, April 7, 2008

Founder of Wikipedia discourages academic use:

From the Chronicle of Higher Education:

Jimmy Wales, one founder of Wikipedia, states that “For God sake, you’re in college; don’t cite the encyclopedia.” He goes on to say that he might be creating a summary of info about Wikipedia is (and isn't).

Personally, I don't find myself using the site much. It's fun to play around with, but one would be foolish to attempt real research with the Wikipedia. Anyone can change anything at any time. There is a common myth going around that something that is changed for the ill will be reverted within minutes. Let me tell you here and now - that is completely untrue. There are good Samaritans out there who will change a page back to what it should be, but if it is not...ugh....


Cheers,
MS

Friday, March 21, 2008

Windows Online?

Bill Gates, creator of the (in)famous Windows operating system has expressed an interest in further changing the way we compute. Get this: He plans for the next generation of Windows to be 100 % online. All software would be run from the internet. Computers would just be means of connecting to the internet and the operating system.

That's nuts.

First of all, what if I want to use my computer WITHOUT being connected to the Internet? Sorry - out of luck. Billy Gate's plan would require a computer to be connected to the Net to even function. No thanks. I'll pass.

If that's not enough, consider the plethora of security issues we would inevitably face. Every bit of your data would be filed online - vulnerable to hackers, viruses, bots, unwelcome visitors, and identity thieves.

This is one reason I'll be switching to Mac when I get the funds. Frankly, I don't trust Microsoft to get it right the first time. It's a scary thought.

"Dude! You're gettin' a Mac!"